Question

133

'observe' on 'MutationObserver': parameter 1 is not of type 'Node'

rated 0 times [ 138] [ 5] / answers: 1 / hits: 97032 / 8 Years ago, thu, november 3, 2016, 12:00:00

I am creating a Chrome extension and trying to include a small text beside the SEND button of the gMail compose box.

I am using a MutationObserver to know when the compose box window appears. I am doing this by observing an element with class no since the compose box element is created as child of this element (class no).

When the user clicks on the compose button and the compose box window appears, then I place an element beside the SEND button using the .after() method. SEND button class name is .gU.Up.

These are the real class names of gMail and pretty weird too.

Below is the code I am using:

var composeObserver = new MutationObserver(function(mutations){ 

    mutations.forEach(function(mutation){

        mutation.addedNodes.forEach(function(node){

            $(.gU.Up).after(<td> <div> Hi </div> </td>);

        });

    });

});



var composeBox = document.querySelectorAll(.no)[2];

var config = {childList: true};

composeObserver.observe(composeBox,config);

The problem is that I constantly get following error:

Uncaught TypeError: Failed to execute 'observe' on 'MutationObserver': parameter 1 is not of type 'Node'

Can anyone help? I have tried quite a few things and also looked at other answers here, but still am unable to get rid of this error.

Here is my manifest.json file:

{

    manifest_version: 2,

    name: Gmail Extension,

    version: 1.0,



    browser_action: {

        default_icon: icon19.png,   

        default_title: Sales Analytics Sellulose    

    },



    background: {

        scripts: [eventPage.js],

        persistent: false

    },



    content_scripts: [

    {

        matches: [https://mail.google.com/*],

        js: [jquery-3.1.1.js, insQ.min.js, gmail_cs.js]

    }

],



    web_accessible_resources:[

        compose_icon.png,

        sellulosebar_icon.png 

    ]

}

P.S. I have already tried the insertionquery library, but it has a few shortcomings. It doesn't let me be specific as to the changes in the specific element. I am yet to try the mutationsummary library, but since it uses MutationObserver, I figured the issue will persist.

Added from comment:

It is true that the selector is not giving me a node. I checked in the console, it's giving a object. I also checked in the console and it's selecting the appropriate element that I want to be observed.

However, when I add console.log for the element selected, it's showing as undefined. Which means, you are probably right about code executing prior to nodes coming into existence. Can you tell me how to make sure the delay happens? will 'setTimeout' work? How does it work in case of MutationObserver?

Answers

Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.

bobbyallanh

Add To Favorites

Follow

Total Points: 693

Total Questions: 120

Total Answers: 101

Location: Bermuda

Member since Thu, Apr 20, 2023

1 Year ago

answered 8 Years ago yosefleod · Accepted Answer

As I mentioned in a comment, and Xan stated an answer, the error makes it clear that the result of document.querySelectorAll(.no)[2] does not evaluate to a Node.

From the information you provided in a comment, it is clear that the issue is that the node you desire to observe does not exist when your code executes. There are many ways to delay the execution of your code until that node is available. Some possibilities are:

Using a setTimeout loop to poll until you detect that the element on which you want to put the MutationObserver is available:

function addObserverIfDesiredNodeAvailable() {

    var composeBox = document.querySelectorAll(.no)[2];

    if(!composeBox) {

        //The node we need does not exist yet.

        //Wait 500ms and try again

        window.setTimeout(addObserverIfDesiredNodeAvailable,500);

        return;

    }

    var config = {childList: true};

    composeObserver.observe(composeBox,config);

}

addObserverIfDesiredNodeAvailable();

This will find the appropriate node relatively shortly after it exists in the DOM. The viability of this method depends on how long after the insertion of the target node do you need the observer to be placed on it. Obviously, you can adjust the delay between polling attempts based on your needs.

Create another MutationObserver to watch an ancestor node higher in the DOM for the insertion of the node on which you want to place your primary observer. While this will find the appropriate node immediately when it is inserted, it may be quite resource (CPU) intensive, depending on how high in the DOM you have to observe and how much activity there is with respect to DOM changes.