Monday, May 20, 2024
 Popular · Latest · Hot · Upcoming
193
rated 0 times [  194] [ 1]  / answers: 1 / hits: 70141  / 8 Years ago, wed, february 10, 2016, 12:00:00

I attempt to send a GET request in a jQuery AJAX request.



$.ajax({
type: 'GET',
url: /* <the link as string> */,
dataType: 'text/html',
success: function() { alert(Success); },
error: function() { alert(Error); },
});


However, whatever I've tried, I got XMLHttpRequest cannot load <page>. No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource. Origin 'http://localhost:7776' is therefore not allowed access.



I tried everything, from adding header : {} definitions to the AJAX request to setting dataType to JSONP, or even text/plain, using simple AJAX instead of jQuery, even downloading a plugin that enables CORS - but nothing could help.



And the same happens if I attempt to reach any other sites.



Any ideas for a proper and simple solution? Is there any at all?


More From » jquery

 Answers
41

This is by design. You can't make an arbitrary HTTP request to another server using XMLHttpRequest unless that server allows it by putting out an Access-Control-Allow-Origin header for the requesting host.



https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Access_control_CORS



You could retrieve it in a script tag (there isn't the same restriction on scripts and images and stylesheets), but unless the content returned is a script, it won't do you much good.



Here's a tutorial on CORS:



http://www.bennadel.com/blog/2327-cross-origin-resource-sharing-cors-ajax-requests-between-jquery-and-node-js.htm



This is all done to protect the end user. Assuming that an image is actually an image, a stylesheet is just a stylesheet and a script is just a script, requesting those resources from another server can't really do any harm.



But in general, cross-origin requests can do really bad things. Say that you, Zoltan, are using coolsharks.com. Say also that you are logged into mybank.com and there is a cookie for mybank.com in your browser. Now, suppose that coolsharks.com sends an AJAX request to mybank.com, asking to transfer all your money into another account. Because you have a mybank.com cookie stored, they successfully complete the request. And all of this happens without your knowledge, because no page reload occurred. This is the danger of allowing general cross-site AJAX requests.



If you want to perform cross-site requests, you have two options:




  1. Get the server you are making the request to to either

    a. Admit you by putting out a Access-Control-Allow-Origin header that includes you (or *)

    b. Provide you with a JSONP API.



or




  1. Write your own browser that doesn't follow the standards and has no restrictions.



In (1), you must have the cooperation of the server you are making requests to, and in (2), you must have control over the end user's browser. If you can't fulfill (1) or (2), you're pretty much out of luck.



However, there is a third option (pointed out by charlietfl). You can make the request from a server that you do control and then pass the result back to your page. E.g.



<script>
$.ajax({
type: 'GET',
url: '/proxyAjax.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2F10m',
dataType: 'text/html',
success: function() { alert(Success); },
error: function() { alert(Error); }
});
</script>


And then on your server, at its most simple:



<?php
// proxyAjax.php
// ... validation of params
// and checking of url against whitelist would happen here ...
// assume that $url now contains http://stackoverflow.com/10m
echo file_get_contents($url);


Of course, this method may run into other issues:




  • Does the site you are a proxy for require the correct referrer or a certain IP address?

  • Do cookies need to be passed through to the target server?

  • Does your whitelist sufficiently protect you from making arbitrary requests?

  • Which headers (e.g. modify time, etc) will you be passing back to the browser as your server received them and which ones will you omit or change?

  • Will your server be implicated as having made a request that was unlawful (since you are acting as a proxy)?



I'm sure there are others. But if none of those issues prevent it, this third method could work quite well.


[#63370] Monday, February 8, 2016, 8 Years  [reply] [flag answer]
Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
gabriel

Total Points: 323
Total Questions: 107
Total Answers: 108

Location: Federated States of Micronesia
Member since Sun, May 16, 2021
3 Years ago
;