Question

9

Local storage vs AngularJS $cacheFactory

rated 0 times [ 16] [ 7] / answers: 1 / hits: 74941 / 11 Years ago, thu, october 10, 2013, 12:00:00

I have a problem of storing a lot of client-side data, and I can't decide which way is better. Now I'm using AngularJS's cacheFactory, it works fine, but all data reloads with a new session. Is it worth to use local storage instead?

Answers

Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.

jazminkyrap

Add To Favorites

Follow

Total Points: 631

Total Questions: 89

Total Answers: 109

Location: Finland

Member since Fri, Oct 21, 2022

2 Years ago

jazminkyrap questions

1 How to fix error: Fontconfig error: Cannot load default config file

Sat, Apr 17, 21, 00:00, 3 Years ago

1 How to return an attribute of clicked element in react?

Sun, Jul 5, 20, 00:00, 4 Years ago

1 why do I got Uncaught TypeError: response.text is not a function error when try to assignt body received as text to a variable in javascript

Sat, May 16, 20, 00:00, 4 Years ago

1 Error This line has a length of 182. Maximum allowed is 100 max-len

Thu, Apr 16, 20, 00:00, 4 Years ago

1 Selecting an html node's text content with htmlparser2 in Node.js

Mon, May 27, 19, 00:00, 5 Years ago

View All

answered 11 Years ago toddbrandtc · Accepted Answer

If your goal is to store client-side and persistent data, you can't use the $cacheFactory, which just caches the data for the current session.

One solution is to use the new local storage API. This awesome Angular module makes all the dirty job for you, and even falls back to cookies for old browsers!