Question

22

Get variable names with JavaScript

rated 0 times [ 29] [ 7] / answers: 1 / hits: 15362 / 12 Years ago, mon, april 23, 2012, 12:00:00

I want to create a log function where I can insert variable names like this:

var a = '123',

    b = 'abc';



log([a, b]);

And the result should look like this in the console.log

a: 123

b: abc

Get the value of the variable is no problems but how do I get the variable names? The function should be generic so I can't always assume that the scope is window.

Answers

Only authorized users can answer the question. Please sign in first, or register a free account.

tayla

Add To Favorites

Follow

Total Points: 681

Total Questions: 102

Total Answers: 108

Location: Marshall Islands

Member since Tue, Sep 21, 2021

3 Years ago

tayla questions

1 Problem embedding tiktok video into angular 7

Fri, Mar 5, 21, 00:00, 3 Years ago

1 Lodash - How to merge two arrays of objects based on key?

Wed, Oct 28, 20, 00:00, 4 Years ago

1 Horizontal scroll bar is appearing after using slick slider in the webpage

Wed, Oct 21, 20, 00:00, 4 Years ago

1 Jest: `querySelector` returns null in test of a ReactJS component

Sat, Jul 4, 20, 00:00, 4 Years ago

1 setTimeout with Promises

Thu, Apr 9, 20, 00:00, 4 Years ago

View All

answered 12 Years ago elmer · Accepted Answer

so the argument is an array of variables? then no, there is no way to get the original variable name once it is passed that way. in the receiving end, they just look like:

[123,abc];

and nothing more

you could provide the function the names of the variables and the scope they are in, like:

function log(arr,scope){

    for(var i=0;i<arr.length;i++){

        console.log(arr[i]+':'scope[arr[i]]);

    }

}

however, this runs into the problem if you can give the scope also. there are a lot of issues of what this is in certain areas of code:

for nonstrict functions, this is window

for strict functions, this is undefined

for constructor functions, this is the constructed object

within an object literal, this is the immediate enclosing object

so you can't rely on passing this as a scope. unless you can provide the scope, this is another dead end.

if you pass them as an object, then you can iterate through the object and its keys and not the original variable names. however, this is more damage than cure in this case.